| Overall score | 4.4Best value | 4.3Best value | 4.1Best value |
|---|
| Scalability | 5.0Best value Serverless into the petabyte range, no cluster management. | 5.0Best value Compute and storage scale elastically and independently. | 4.5Best value Columnar and very fast on large event volumes. |
|---|
| EU data sovereignty | 3.5Best value An EU region exists, but the default is US and the vendor stays Google. | 4.0Best value EU regions on AWS, Azure, or GCP; the vendor itself stays US-based. | 4.5Best value Open source and self-hostable in the EU, data under your control. |
|---|
| Value for money | 4.0Best value Usually cheaper than Snowflake for marketing workloads under 1 TB a month. | 3.5Best value Billed by compute minutes; under 1 TB a month BigQuery is usually cheaper. | 4.5Best value No licence costs, strong performance per euro of infrastructure. |
|---|
| Low maintenance | 5.0Best value No cluster, no updates, no ops team of your own. | 4.5Best value Managed, but warehouses and credits still need governing. | 3.0Best value Needs data engineering resources for operations and tuning. |
|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based (storage + queries) | Usage-based (credits) | Open source; usage-based cloud |
|---|
| Vendor | Google · USA | Snowflake · USA | ClickHouse · USA |
|---|
| Operating model | EU-Region | EU-Region | EU-Region |
|---|
| Last reviewed | May 2026 | May 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|
| When it fits | When marketing data from GA4, sGTM and connectors should converge in one queryable place. | When multi-cloud, data sharing or in-house Snowflake skills tip the scales. | When real-time analytics on large event data demands query speed and engineering exists. |
|---|
| When it does not | When a Microsoft or Snowflake stack already exists. Then we build there, not in parallel. | When the setup sits deep in the Google ecosystem; then BigQuery. | When a managed warehouse is enough; BigQuery or Snowflake need less maintenance. |
|---|